[Evolution of blood loss in total knee prosthesis with blood recovery system vs conventional drainage]. / Evolución de la pérdida sanguínea en la prótesis total de rodilla con recuperador de sangre vs drenaje convencional.

INTRODUCTION: knee prosthetic surgery can be associated with significant blood loss that can account for up to 20% of blood volume. The objective of our study is to analyze blood loss (BL) after total knee replacement (TKR), with the use of a blood recovery system vs a normal drain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: prospective, comparative, and observational study of two groups of 30 patients who underwent TKR, one control (CG) and another study group with a recovery system (RG). We analyzed PS, hemoglobin (Hb), hematocrit (Htc), systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and heart rate (HR) at 3-, 24-, 48-, 72- and 96-hours post-surgery, the need for transfusion, and the percentage of discharges in 72 hours and complications. RESULTS: the highest percentage of change in Htc and Hb occurred in the first 3 hours post-surgery and recovery began at 72 hours in the RG (p = 0.02) and at 96 hours in the CG (p = 0.04). The decrease in Hb and Htc began his recovery at 72 hours in the RG and at 96 hours in the CG. The TAS, TAD and FC began their recovery at 72 hours in both groups. The decrease in SBP was greater in the CG at 3 hours (p = 0.02), 24 hours (p = 0.02) and 48 hours (p = 0.01) post-surgery. Six patients were transfused in RG and 10 in CG (p = 0.22). 20% and 74% of the patients were discharged at 72 hours in the CG and RG, respectively. CONCLUSION: the greatest BL occurs in the first 3 hours post-surgery and recovery begins at 72-96 hours. Recovery blood system decreases BL during the first 3 hours, enhance the recuperation of Hb and SBP, decreases the need for transfusion and favors early discharge.

INTRODUCCIÓN: la cirugía protésica total de rodilla (PTR) se puede asociar a pérdidas sanguíneas (PS) significativas. El objetivo es analizar la evolución de la PS tras PTR con recuperador sanguíneo vs drenaje convencional. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: estudio prospectivo de dos grupos de 30 pacientes intervenidos de PTR, uno control (GC) y otro estudio con recuperador (GR). Se analizó la PS, hematocrito (Hcto), hemoglobina (Hb), tensión arterial sistólica (TAS) y diastólica (TAD) y frecuencia cardíaca (FC) a las tres, 24, 48, 72 y 96 horas postquirúrgicas, la necesidad de transfusión, el porcentaje de altas en 72 horas y las complicaciones. RESULTADOS: la mayor PS y porcentaje de cambio de Hcto y Hb se produjo a las tres horas postquirúrgicas e inició su recuperación a las 72 horas en el GR (Hcto, p = 0.02) (Hb, p = 0.04) y a las 96 horas en el GC. La TAS, TAD y FC empezó su recuperación a las 72 horas en ambos grupos. El descenso de TAS fue mayor en el GC a las tres horas (p = 0.02), 24 horas (p = 0.02) y 48 horas (p = 0.01) postquirúrgicas. Veinte y 33% de los pacientes fueron transfundidos, además 20 y 74% fueron dados de alta a las 72 horas en el GC y GR, respectivamente. CONCLUSIÓN: la mayor PS y porcentaje de cambio de Hcto y Hb se produce a las tres horas postquirúrgicas y empieza su recuperación a las 72-96 horas. El recuperador favorece la recuperación del Hcto, Hb y TAS, disminuye la necesidad de transfusión y favorece el alta precoz.

Arthrotomy debridement of arthrostic septic arthritis of the knee is more effective than arthroscopic debridement and delays the need for prosthesis despite progression. / El desbridamiento por artrotomía de la artritis séptica de rodilla artrósica es más eficaz que el artroscópico y retrasa la necesidad de prótesis a pesar de la progresión de la artrosis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: 40%-50% of this septic arthritis occurs in the knee, despite rapid medical surgical treatment, 24%-50% will have a poor clinical outcome. It is not clear which debridement technique, by arthrotomy or arthroscopy, is more effective in controlling infection, or whether or not previous osteoarthritis worsens the outcome. The objective of this study on septic arthritis of the osteoarthritic knee was to analyse which surgical debridement technique, arthroscopy or arthrotomy, is more effective, the clinical and radiographic outcomes of the patients, and how many go on to require a TKR after the infection has healed. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was performed in 27 patients with native septic arthritis of the knee. Eighteen were men and the mean age was 64.8 years (30-89years). Fifteen patients were debrided by arthrotomy and 12 by arthroscopy. The effectiveness of debridement in controlling infection, the radiographic progression of the osteoarthritis on the Ahlbäch scale, the need for subsequent replacement, and pain and functional status were analysed using the VAS and WOMAC scales at 52.8±11.2-month follow-up. RESULTS: The infection was controlled in 93% and 92% of the patients, 13% and 42% required 2 or more surgeries for infection control, 18% and 44.4% showed progression of arthritis in the arthrotomy and arthroscopy groups, respectively. One patient in each group required a knee replacement. The VAS score was superior in the arthrotomy group and there were no differences in WOMAC score. CONCLUSION: Debridement by arthrotomy in the emergency department by non-sub-specialist knee surgeons is more effective than arthroscopic debridement in controlling septic arthritis of the knee. Surgical debridement of septic arthritis in knees with previous osteoarthritis enabled control of the infection with no pain despite the progression of the osteoarthritis.

Validez de las escalas KLIC y CRIME80 en la predicción del fracaso en la infección aguda tardía tratada mediante desbridamiento y retención de implantes / Validity of the KLIC and CRIME80 scores in predicting failure in late acute infection treated by debridement and implant retention

En las infecciones protésicas es muy importante realizar un tratamiento correcto con el que podamos asegurar una mayor tasa de éxito. Si bien es cierto que el desbridamiento con retención de implante (DAIR) es una cirugía muy utilizada en infecciones agudas y agudas tardías, se sabe que los pacientes que no logran el éxito en este tipo de cirugías presentan mayor riesgo de fracaso en cirugías posteriores. Es por ello que es importante encontrar una escala que nos permita predecir el riesgo de fracaso de DAIR. Así nacieron la escala KLIC y CRIME80 para infecciones agudas e infecciones agudas tardías, respectivamente. Con este estudio hemos analizado la validez de ambas escalas en infecciones periprotésicas de rodilla agudas tardías y se ha observado que el KLIC no tiene valor predictivo para este tipo de infecciones, pero sí la escala CRIME80

It is very important to treat prosthetic infections correctly in order to ensure a higher success rate. Debridement with implant retention (DAIR) is widely used in acute and late infections, however patients who fail after this surgery are known to have a higher risk of failure in subsequent surgeries. Therefore, it is important to find a scale that enables us to predict the risk of DAIR failure. Hence the KLIC and CRIME80 scores for acute and late acute infections, respectively. This study analysed the validity of both scores in acute late periprosthetic knee infections. We observed that the KLIC score has no predictive value for this type of infection, but the CRIME80 score does

Validity of the KLIC and CRIME80 scores in predicting failure in late acute infection treated by debridement and implant retention. / Validez de las escalas KLIC y CRIME80 en la predicción del fracaso en la infección aguda tardía tratada mediante desbridamiento y retención de implantes.

It is very important to treat prosthetic infections correctly in order to ensure a higher success rate. Debridement with implant retention (DAIR) is widely used in acute and late infections, however patients who fail after this surgery are known to have a higher risk of failure in subsequent surgeries. Therefore, it is important to find a scale that enables us to predict the risk of DAIR failure. Hence the KLIC and CRIME80 scores for acute and late acute infections, respectively. This study analysed the validity of both scores in acute late periprosthetic knee infections. We observed that the KLIC score has no predictive value for this type of infection, but the CRIME80 score does.

[Prosthetic joint infection by Candida spp.]. / Infección por Candida spp. sobre prótesis articulares.

INTRODUCTION: Fungal periprosthetic infectionis a rare entity. The aim of this report was to review our experience in two different educational hospitals. MATERIAL AND METHODS: patients with documented prosthetic joint infection due to Candida spp. from February 2002 to October 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics, microbiological data, treatment and outcome of each patient was recorded. RESULTS: Ten patients, 8 women and 2 men, with a meanage of 77.7 (range 66-92) years were identified. Nine patients had previous bacterial infection, received antibiotic treatment for more than 15 days and required multiple surgeries. The most frequent species was C. albicans with 6 cases. All patients received fluconazole and surgical treatment consisted of debridement without removing the implant in 3 cases and 2-stage exchange with a spacer in 7. The first surgical and antifungal approach failed in all cases and a second debridement was necessary in one case, a resection arthroplasty in 8 and chronic suppressive treatment with fluconazol in one. After a mean follow-up of 31 (range 2-67) months, two patients were free of infection. CONCLUSION: Prosthetic joint infection was associated with long-term antibiotic treatment and multiples previous surgeries. Treatment with fluconazol and debridement or two stage replacement with a spacer was associated with a high failure rate.